Internet: turning science communication inside-out?

In the four decades since two university computers were first linked to each other over the prototype internet, scientific researchers have been innovators, early adopters and prolific adapters of internet technologies. Electronic mail, file transfer protocol, telnet, Gopher and the World Wide Web were all developed and applied first in research communities. The Web's development for sharing of information in the high-energy physics community unexpectedly heralded the internet's extension into many aspects of commerce, community, entertainment and governance. But despite the rapid proliferation and diversification of both over the past 15 years, the internet in its various forms has scientific communication indelibly inscribed into its fabric, and internet communication is thoroughly integrated into the practice of science. This chapter reviews some effects of the internet's emergence as a principal means of professional scientific communication, and of public communication of science and technology. It notes several paradoxes that characterise these developments, for example the contradictory trends towards easier collaboration across continents, and towards greater fragmentation. It notes the very significant disturbances caused by electronic publishing in the all-important field of scientific journals. It suggests that these and other developments have made more completely porous than before the boundaries between professional and public communication, facilitating public access to previously private spaces, and thus 'turning science communication inside-out'

Representations of the Knowledge Economy: Irish Newspapers\u27 Discourses on a Key Policy Idea

FROM TIME TO TIME, notions take hold in society in such a way that they become reference ideas across diverse social sectors, and terms associated with these reference ideas proliferate in public discourses and media of various kinds. This is notably true for the ‘knowledge economy’ and ‘knowledge society’; these terms have largely displaced other terms to describe the particular character of advanced economies and societies in the early 21st century. Other terms have struggled to co-exist: ‘information society’ seems passé; ‘services society’, ‘audit society’ and ‘risk society’ are marginal or niche terms; ‘innovation society’ has had intermittent periods of prominence. The main purpose of this paper is to examine how ‘knowledge society’ and related terms have been adopted and adapted in media discourses

Policies and practices in supporting scientists’ public communication through training

Scientists are increasingly expected to engage in public communication, though they frequently report that they feel inadequately prepared for such activity. The necessary training for such activity has barely been discussed in the science communication literature. Drawing on country reports from the Monitoring Policy and Research Activities on Science in Society in Europe (MASIS) report, this paper reviews initiatives across Europe to support scientists’ public communication. It examines these within a framework that distinguishes between training oriented to dissemination or dialogue, and to capacity-building of scientists or professionalisation of science communicators. It traces the uneven spread and diverse character of such supports and identifies the four principal groups of policy actors who play distinct roles and, in the case of higher education institutions, sometimes internally contradictory roles. The paper draws on the authors’ own experiences to underline the value of communication training that is oriented to dialogue and stimulates reflexivity